Another new shirt idea
Seems about right.
Another new shirt idea
Seems about right.
(via reddit)
Today it occurred to me that the smartphone is the modern day pocketwatch. Sure it does a lot more, but when I want to check the time, I pull out my phone and hit the button to read the lock screen. Is that really that different from pulling out a pocketwatch and hitting the button to read the clock face?
So my mind started thinking: What would I put in a pocketwatch form factor? Give it the brass case and cover for the “old time” effect. Use the dial and button as the primary interface. Replace the clock face with an LCD.
Instead of a standard clock face, make it more interesting. Hour and minute hands, sure, but also the phase of the moon and the rising and setting of the naked eye celestial objects (sun, moon, Venus, and Mars at least).
Give it the standard GPS, accelerometer , compass, and bluetooth. Make it display a globe centered on your current position. Let it give you a compass pointing both north and back to your house/camp/car/whatever.
Wonder what else useful it could do.
Space shuttle Enterprise, mounted atop a NASA 747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA), is seen off in the distance behind the Statue of Liberty, Friday, April 27, 2012, in New York. Enterprise was the first shuttle orbiter built for NASA performing test flights in the atmosphere and was incapable of spaceflight. Originally housed at the Smithsonian’s Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center, Enterprise will be demated from the SCA and placed on a barge that will eventually be moved by tugboat up the Hudson River to the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum in June. Photo Credit: (NASA/Bill Ingalls)
My favorite shot of Enterprise flying over NYC.
Day and Night in New York City Captured in Single Images by Stephen Wilkes.
(via npr)
Syfy doing more sci-fi? Will wonders never cease?
Fire, fire… eheheheh…
James May at 70,000 feet. The view is just amazing up there. It would be amazing if I could do that just once.
I do not often post religion or politics, and this is arguably both. But this speech just stuck me very strongly, and I wanted to share it.
In Matthew 7, in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus warns against false teachers, and he offers a principle that can be used to test good teaching from bad teaching. By their fruit, you will recognize them, he says. Every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Good teachings, according to Jesus, have good consequences. That doesn’t mean that following Christian teaching will or should be easy, and in fact, many of Jesus’s commands are not easy at all - turning the other cheek, loving your enemies, laying down your life for your friends. But those are all profound acts of love that both reflect God’s love for us and that powerfully affirm the dignity and worth of human life and of human beings. Good teachings, even when they are very difficult, are not destructive to human dignity. They don’t lead to emotional and spiritual devastation, and to the loss of self-esteem and self-worth. But those have been the consequences for gay people of the traditional teaching on homosexuality. It has not borne good fruit in their lives, and it’s caused them incalculable pain and suffering. If we’re taking Jesus seriously that bad fruit cannot come from a good tree, then that should cause us to question whether the traditional teaching is correct.
[…]
Our discussion of this issue, of the “gay issue,” can’t take place in the realm of abstractions, of musings about ideal design and ideal gender roles, as though gay people don’t even exist. Jesus placed a particular focus on those others overlooked, on those who were outcast, on mistreated and marginalized minorities. And if we are working to emulate the life of Christ, then that’s where our focus needs to be, too. Romans 12 tells us to “honor one another above yourselves…rejoice with those who rejoice,” and “mourn with those who mourn.” Hebrews 13:3 says, “Remember those who are mistreated as if you yourselves were suffering.” How fully have you absorbed, not just the existence of gay and lesbian Christians, but the depth of the pain and the hurt that their own brothers and sisters have inflicted on them? Does that pain grieve you as though it were your own?
And how aware are you of the ways in which you may be contributing to suffering and hurt in gay people’s lives? It’s still commonplace for straight Christians to say, “Yes, I believe that homosexuality is a sin, but don’t blame me - I’m just reading the Bible. That’s just what it says.” Well, first of all, no, you are not just reading the Bible. You are taking a few verses out of context and extracting from them an absolute condemnation that was never intended. But you are also striking to the very core of another human being and gutting them of their sense of dignity and of self-worth. You are reinforcing the message that gay people have heard for centuries: You will always be alone. You come from a family, but you’ll never form one of your own. You are uniquely unworthy of loving and being loved by another person, and all because you’re different, because you’re gay.
(Source: youtube.com)